Witt/Nittel: Court forbids spreading of untrue statement - again the Heidelberger is subject to law office before court

(openPR) - Munich, which 05.02.2007 - the regional court has Hamburg the Kanzlei Witt/Nittel forbidden (AZ 324 O 972/06), to spread further that the Kanzlei would have reached a back completion of a participation of an investor in the FIDURA accumulation of assets and security fund. Thus the court stated clearly that for weeks the relevant expressions set up publicly by this, among other things in the investment right active Kanzlei are wrong. Resident of Munich the issuing house FIDURA Capital Consult had on that already referred to in detail in November 2006 in a press release.

With the provisional order issued now, against which still redresses are possible, it is now also judicially gotten straight that the issuing house FIDURA does not have „problems with the truth “, as this was maintained in one vollmundig on different Internet portals by the Kanzlei Witt/Nittel in connection with an allegedly reached back completion of a fund participation. Rather the Kanzlei Witt/Nittel obviously does not shrink from back to spread untrue factual statements in order to make attentive the purpose of the mandator production on itself.

The Kanzlei Witt/Nittel is supported thereby by apparently neutral associations like German consumer protection ring (DVS) and federation for social and civilian right consciousness (BSZ), which drive the investors under the cover of the non-profit character into the arms of such lawyers.

Already in October 2006 the regional court forbade Munich of the Kanzlei Witt/Nittel (AZ 7 O 16794/06), to recruit in marktschreierischer way mandators. The befremdliche business manners of the Kanzlei Witt/Nittel used also the South German newspaper as an opportunity to report under the title „lawyers as Marktschreier “in detail and critically over this „fishing after mandators “, condition-legally inadmissible for lawyers, (sp, 15 November 2006).

In December 2006 by the regional court Darmstadt with judgement was stated of 08.12.2006 (AZ 17 O 545/06) that the issuing house FIDURA Capital Consult GmbH may refer completely rightfully to the fact publicly that itself the Kanzlei has Witt/Nittel (for the purpose of the mandator production) touched down on a “unparalleled rushing campaign of the disputed Anlegerschützers Gerlach”. The Kanzlei Witt/Nittel lost also here at full extent a law case, which it had exerted against residents of Munich the issuing house. Against this judgement the Kanzlei inserted appointment, did not justify these however so far more near.

„Although the Heidelberger Kanzlei with your dubious driving remained unsuccessful so far to disconcert and into senseless processes drive is it most concern exciting, how lawyers, who would have actually to be committed to the truth, from purely economic interests and under feigning the investor protection try here, investors of a successful plant product ", so Klaus Ragotzky, managing director of the issuing house FIDURA Capital Consult.

FIDURA Capital Consult GmbH
Pressing and public work
Dr. Michael Lehner
Bavariaring 44
D - 80336 Munich
Tel: +49 (89) 23 88 98 - 22
Fax: +49 (89) 23 88 98 - 29
www.fidura-fonds.de, lehner@fidura.de

FIDURA Capital Consult is an issuing house for closed private Equity fund. FIDURA private Equity fund have themselves the goal set normal investors a direct entrance to the net yield-strong plant class private Equity to make possible - without detours and net yield loss.

Therefore FIDURA private Equity fund take part directly - without inserting of third funds - in enterprises. Due to a comprehensive information and control basis, which a directly investing fund possesses with each individual enterprise, participation success can be foreseen and steered particularly well.

Dieser Artikel wurde veröffentlicht auf
OpenPR - http://openpr.de/news/118623/Witt-Nittel-Gericht-untersagt-Verbreitung-unwahrer-Behauptung-erneut-unterliegt-die-Heidelberger-Anwaltskanzlei-vor-Gericht.html